MPC Inc. undesirable effects (UDE's)

[ go back to mpc inc Homepage]

Date: Thu, 30 jan 1997

From: Joseph N. pangilinan

To: tu dinh nguyen

Dear Mr. Nguyen,

I listed below some of our "UDE's", mostly related to inconsistent product quality and reliability (of schedules) which cause low over-all reliability. this really started out as a backyard hobby, but has now grown into more serious business. for the effort, financial rewards are embarassing, but i see immense potential, if we simplify and do things correctly. sorry to have to unload these to you like this. if you want me to work on them further, let me know.

INTRODUCTION:

As you know, we manufacture very special hand-wrought iron and hand-wooven wicker furniture and furnishings. we produced-in various quantities- roughly 50,000 pieces of about 100 different designs last year. i would imagine that i would have a different constraint (bottleneck) for every design ordered. some designs skip processes such as weaving, for example. our factory works on job order (F.O.B.-Manila) basis. Orders, which consist of varying quantities of an average of 4-6 different designs, are closed at trade shows or by fax/ mail (in the case of existing customers) and are only released to the production floor as soon as these are covered by a letter of credit or telegraphic transfer. most details of designs are agreed upon based on prototypes sent (and corrections made) before the order is actually closed. Usually, the L/C is released 15 to 30 days after the orders are placed by customers. the L/C is an assurance that goods are paid immediately upon proof of departure from the port. it has happened a few times in the past when we would start producing orders that are not covered by L/C only to be left with unpaid goods that need to be re-sold locally or elsewhere. this whole cycle from the written order (or signed pro-forma offers) to delivery takes anywhere from 60 to 75 days, but we work on several orders of varying magnitudes at the same time (maybe 10-15). collections are received in our bank a week after the shipment.

Generally, we follow the same basic processes even if the designs are different and these are usually in the following sequential order:

  • a) proforma offering (Quotations and prototypes and drawings made, if necessary)
  • b) order placement (signed ProForma)
  • c) job order preparation (Scheduling, bill of materials Purchasing)
  • d) fabrication (Cut, Bend, Weld, Grind)
  • 100% inspection
  • e) metal surface preparation (phosphating) & epoxy priming or powdercoating
  • f) weaving
  • 100% inspection
  • g) wicker painting & drying
  • 100% inspection
  • h) final steel finishing & drying
  • 100% inspection
  • i) assembly (other parts of wood, resin, plastic, stone, brass, when necessary depending on the design)
  • j) packing & loading
  • k) shipment & documentation
  • Factory workers are paid either on a daily rate or as regular piece-workers (so throughput is selling price less material cost and Piece-Rate). although we have a lot of problems internally, i can say we have established an excellent reputation and goodwill with foreign and domestic buyers of our special kind of "hand-made" furniture, as a reliable, quality supplier. most of our problems, i would say stems from a lack of a focused product-market strategy coupled with our deep-rooted marriage with the "Cost World".

    What we say we believe in is often what we think we believe in, but could actually be different from what we practice. deliberately or not, people only put time and effort in doing what they truly believe in or value. so although we claim to strive to exceed customer expectations in terms of quality, and in fact are by far one of the best quality suppliers of our type of furniture and furnishings, we still have a host of quality problems that result in voluminous rework and rejects. Naturally, this affects throughput, increases inventory and operating expense. inspection efforts, a necessary evil, is never enough.

    UDEs

  • (1) our throughput has barely increased even after we moved to a brand new factory-double the space of the last one -- 2 years ago; profitability remains very low (5-10% of gross revenues). last year, we lost about 5% or so-mainly due to the strike. inventory is quite high, specially work-in-process inventory.
  • (2) product quality is not consistent. the rate of quality rejects is apparently rising. to most workers in the company, the concept of quality is a vague, unreachable, intangible, non-entity, illusion. it has different meanings to different people. Often, the concept of "quality" and meeting customers' needs really means very little to many of us. sometimes we say we value something, but in reality , it means nothing to us compared to other higher values. quality defects and rework seem an accepted part of the process.
  • (3) current quality systems and procedures followed do not assure consistent quality. there is a lack of an apparent tangible benefit for the employees to think of quality, expect only quality & produce quality work.
  • (4) there is no real culture or concern for quality in the company.
  • People's lack of hands-on appreciation and value for quality, plus certain wrong attitudes and behaviours we show or tolerate, hinder us from delivering customers products and service beyond their expectations.
  • (5) our problems per se are not difficult to solve. something is hindering us or keeping us from solving the problem permanently. what is difficult is finding the core problems and breaking inertia or the bad habit of procrastinating the solutions to them.
  • (6) some common attitudes in the plant:
  • Common Attitude.

  • (7) Perceptively, there is not enough apparent presence of management and key employees to improve quality at the shop floor. management seem so busy fighting fires, so they lose the time and the motivation to commit to solving this key problem of quality. not enough people among management and key officers are committed enough to solve quality problems permanently.
  • (8) passing the buck-top management is relying on middle management to solve the quality problems permanently. mid management (e.g. Marketing) is frustrated and hopes top management will show concern and step into the picture. middle management chooses to solve other problems-leaving the quality problem to permanently solve itself. middle management are not yet able to manage the firm by themselves.
  • Workers complain that middle management blocks their complaints and suggestions from reaching top management.
  • (9) marketing hopes production will realize how much we have been insulted and lambasted by our customers.
  • (10)Production is frustrated and hopes other departments "understand" their difficult situation and help solve the problems rather than simply criticize and complain.
  • (11) production hopes marketing will provided more definite and clear order instructions and be more compassionate about the difficulty of eating dirt in the field.
  • (12) top management-myself included-often puts higher value in external involvements (furniture and export industry associations) and other "priority" projects (WHICH cost MONEY) like new technology, product development, foreign trade shows and marketing missions.
  • (13) we do not know exactly how to identify the current bottlenecks, much less exploit and subordinate others.
  • Some suspects include-order closing & PREPARATION, FINISHING(PAINTING), WEAVING. i also see a lot of idle time between processes. order batches wait for quality inspection prior to transfer. transferred items wait for specific assignments prior to actual operation in the next step. sometimes materials are delayed and so on.
  • (14) production lead time is unreliable. our basis for determining quality and true production status is not reliable. Sometimes, we assume we know the truth about production status, even if we are not confident that it is the real TRUTH. we do not tell our customers the whole TRUTH, that what we claim to be true is in fact just hopefully true. some buyers are beginning to get frustrated with our unreliable lead times.
  • Causes of quality fiascos are diverse: wrong finish, weak construction, poor
  • packaging, loading
  • (15) the costs associated with poor quality are too expensive to ignore. we are beginning to lose customers - and the costs associated with losing a key customer is equal to that of finding a new one out of 50 hot prospects (say those we talk to at trade shows). there is continuous pressure to find new customers maybe because of fear that we lose the existing ones.
  • (16) competition is fierce in Italy, Indonesia, China, malaysia and other philippine companies. in the customer's perception, we are very good people to talk to. we seem trustworthy and will not fool them. our products are reputedly the best in terms of finishing quality, look & feel in comparison to other suppliers, but some clients do not think it is worth the price premium we charge (sometimes 50% more). and inconveniences and costs associated with quality rejects make us look less attractive.
  • (17) stockholders (my family) are getting impatient. they want me to either make more money here and now, or just close the business. my father has given me six months to turn this thing around.
  • I personally can make the most critical decisions.
  • I personally would like to prove we can get out of this rut. the market is unlimited, provided the price is right and lead times are reliable. with all these problems, there is a lot of money to be made.
  • Joseph
  • Joseph N. pangilinan
  • "As steel sharpens steel, so do men sharpen men."