[Vtic2003] RE: VTIC2003

[Tri Caohuu]

I would recommend option (2) if  papers are the only missing elements
Keep it up,

TC


At 05:32 PM 5/6/2003 -0700, you wrote:
>content-class: urn:content-classes:message
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>         boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C31430.25143986"
>
>Dear VTIC2003 Organizing Committee:
>
>First of all, thank you for your suggestions on what to do next with 
>VTIC2003.  Please send me your vote on one of the following 2 options:
>
>1)  Postpone VTIC2003 to next year (2004).
>2)  Extend the abstract submission deadline to June 1, 2003.  The full 
>paper deadline will be pushed by one month.  This option will require 
>aggressive approach to potential authors.
>
>You have 48 hours to cast a vote.  I will send out the decision by 6PM 
>5/8/2003.
>
>Thank you for your time and effort.
>
>Regards,
>
>Nhan
>-----Original Message----- From:   Nhan T. Do  Sent:   Monday, May 05, 
>2003 5:27 PM To:     'vtic2003 at vacets.org' Subject:        VTIC2003
>
>Dear all,
>
>As of today, Tri and I have received only 13 abstracts for the 
>VTIC2003.  There may be a number of reasons for the low number of 
>submission this year.  Two possible main reasons are (1) the current 
>economic situation and (2) proximity (time) of this to VTIC2002. I would 
>urgently like to call for an on-line discussion of what to do next.  I am 
>proposing the following 2 options:
>
>1)  Postpone VTIC2003 to next year 2)  Extend the abstract submission 
>deadline again
>
>Please send me any other option you can think of in the next 24 hours.  I 
>will then post all the options to the organizing committee for a quick 
>vote. Thank you for your time and effort.
>
>Regards,
>
>Nhan
>_______________________________________________
>Vtic2003 mailing list
>Vtic2003 at vacets.org
>http://mail.saigon.com/mailman/listinfo/vtic2003